During our most recent appearance on WGVA (available here), Ted Baker asked us “What would you do if you were mayor?” While we were quick to point out that neither one of us is interested in becoming mayor, we offered a few ideas of our own on solutions to the problems of local government in the City of Geneva.
For starters, we’d like Council to become a well prepared, highly informed, deeply engaged deliberative body, respectful of dialogue. In our view, it is up to the Mayor to facilitate the group. That would involve facing fears, moving forward with confidence, exercising strong leadership skills, and being well organized.
We’d also like to see the Mayor schedule more work sessions, such as the budget workshops held by City staff and Council in 2006, to allow close interaction between Councilors and City staff. People can roll up their sleeves, study the issues, and solve problems, with lots of interaction, and in a public way.
Another thing we might do is look at well-functioning government bodies to see if we can get ideas for improving our own operating system. We believe one of the reasons for the success of Ontario County Board of Supervisors and Canandaigua City Council is their committee system. Unfortunately, the Geneva City Charter frowns upon standing committees. The alternative, that we have right now, requires councilors to serve as a “jack of all trades” on issues from public safety to public works, debt service to recreation services. We know what the other half of that old cliché is, and we think it should be changed in the name of better government.
The buck should stop with the Mayor. The Mayor is the public leader, accountable to the voters, and ought to lead the Council in setting a course for the City. He is then responsible for giving direction to City staff, who are our career civil servants and government professionals.
Right now, we have an inversion, where city staff often sets the agenda for Council. Council is often in a reactive, rather than a pro-active mode. Whether you like the results or not, you can appreciate the problem of having non-elected people calling the shots. That needs to be the other way around and it is up to the Mayor to lead that effort.
Of course, we’d like more open discussion. Get things out of the back room and onto the Council floor. We shouldn’t worry about how much time that takes. If a proper discussion means two meetings each month, so be it. Council used to meet twice a month, until about 2005, and got a lot of business done, including the Hampton Inn, the Social Security Building, the Seneca Falls Savings Bank, and the Lyons National Bank
Lastly, the Mayor should foster a collaborative partnership between Council and the City Manager. There is an International City Manager’s Association of which our own manager is a member. They have a code of ethics that clearly specifies the role the Manager should play and how he should interact with his Council. The Mayor’s role is to ensure that these standards of professionalism are adhered to; that the City Manager deals with Council as a body rather than cultivating individualized personal relationships with councilors that lead to one-on-one deals being struck outside of the public meetings.
There’s much more to say, but that’s an overview of what we talked about with Ted Baker. We never have advance notice of the questions he’ll be posing to us, and the ideas we came up with in the interview were just our initial reaction to the question. But we realized, after the interview, that this is a great question to pose to the community at large. We’d now like to ask our readers the question Ted Baker asked us: “What would you do if you were Mayor?” Let us know .
3 comments:
If i were Mayor??Allow me to begin by saying i don't think i am qualified to be a Mayor but with that said,the first thing i would do is make a recommendation that Rich Rising be let go.With a new Mayor house should be cleaned and that means you root out the source of the problem.I would give him a chance to resign gracefully but the bottom line is if he doesn't accept,then i want him fired!!!The second order of business is to make an announcement that the party is over.There will be no more backroom politics.The Mayor's door should be wide open not only to council but to Geneva's wonderful citizens.I would also return the twice a month meetings to the docket.The bottom line,if you can't serve the city twice a month in a meeting capacity then you do not need to be a councilor.Lastly,there will be no backroom deals with entrepeneurs looking for an easy in or if you prefer,the days of the bluebloods are over.If you are businessman and there is something you wish(for example,the developement of the lakeshore)then it will be done properly with all voicing their opinions until the matter can be either discussed or shelved.I would like to add an addendum to all of this,i would make it a high priority to buy back Seneca Lake State Park and return the property to the city.Geneva lost it's identity giving up that parcel of land and quite frankly,as beautiful as it is,it is not worth six dollars per car to enter it.These are my thoughts.My name is Frank Sarratori and i am a Genevan living for the present time,in Virginia.
Thanks for asking a question i have often thought about... Here are some of my thoughts...
Foster more open and honest government. In my view, the Geneva City Government is a democracy theme park. Facts around important issues are rarely well developed and disseminated to the public and Council’s public debate about a course of action is stilted and incomplete because the outcome is predetermined.
As Mayor, I would try to make Council more democratic and user friendly by:
1. Creating fact sheets on important topics of public interest or on the Council agenda so the Community has more accurate information about these matters and a sounder basis for debate…
2. Defining all important political processes and procedures so that we can improve/enhance public participation in local affairs. (If I had to, I would graphically represent these processes so everyone can understand them.)
3. Changing the City Charter to foster more participation by unaffiliated voters on the Boards and Commissions of the City such as the Planning, Zoning Board and the Human Rights Commission.
I would also, actively promote the financial solvency of the City. The City of Geneva faces a daunting challenge remaining financially secure. Virtually all area’s non-profit organizations are concentrated within the City limits as a result of boundaries that were drawn over 100 years ago. But residents of the Town in large measure enjoy these organizations as well. The financial burden of the diminished revenue from organization with tax exempt status is born entirely by City property owners. As Mayor I would support initiatives that increase efficiency in City government and also increase City revenues including:
1. Ask many questions about the efficiency of City operations.
2. Support the implementation of a local hotel occupancy tax with the revenue being returned to the general fund.
3. Initiate a dialogue with the Town of Geneva regarding areas where we can work together to share services and reduce costs.
4. Create a “tax scorecard” that is brought to every City Council meeting for prominent display to serve as a reminder that Council needs to explain the tax implications of every action it takes.
5. Actively support the new governor’s strategy of consolidation of local government entities which are a hold-over from another era… and also engage the Town in a constructive dialogue on this issue.
Downtown enhancement and development. Actively support initiatives and programs to preserve and enhance the traditional downtown urban character of the City that uniquely distinguishes us from other communities and is at the core of our economic development and tourism strategies.
Review City spending practices to enhance the environment. Encourage the City Administration to consider the environmental impacts of all its expenditures to assure residents that we are being good stewards of the environment and contributing to a better future for our children.
Ken Camera
163 Lafayette Ave.
Frank,
We don't entirely agree with all you've said, but we stand by your right to say them. You have signed your name and we appreciate your willingness to speak your mind without wearing an 'invisibility cloak'.
Post a Comment